Fans claim Mbonambi was speaking in Afrikaans after alleged slur

Was South Africa’s ‘white ****’ slur lost in translation? Springboks fans say Bongi Mbonambi was speaking in Afrikaans – and Google Translate shows they may have a case

  • England star Tom Curry accused Bongi Mbonambi of calling him a ‘white ****’ 
  • World Rugby launched probe into alleged slur after England’s loss to Springboks 
  • Some fans claimed Mbonambi was speaking in Afrikaans and was misheard  
  • Latest Rugby World Cup 2023 news, including fixtures, live scores and results

South Africa fans have claimed Bongi Mbonambi could have been speaking in Afrikaans after being accused of calling Tom Curry a ‘white ****’ during South Africa’s 16-15 Rugby World Cup semi-final victory on Saturday.

England flanker Curry complained to referee Ben O’Keeffe following the alleged incident at the Stade de France, before World Rugby later launched an investigation. 

Curry said: ‘Sir, sir, if their hooker calls me a white ****, what do I do?’ O’Keeffe replied: ‘Nothing, please.’ The incident was picked up by microphones in the 28th minute of the game.

After the final whistle, there was a noticeable altercation between Curry and the 32-year-old Mbonambi, who appeared to refuse to shake the England forward’s hand and marched off down the tunnel. 

However, some supporters in South Africa believe Mbonambi had been misheard and may have been speaking in Afrikaans. They suggested the hooker may have been saying ‘wit kant’ – which translates to ‘white side’ – indicating the colour England were playing in on the day.


Some South Africa fans believe Bongi Mbonambi (right) was lost in translation after England’s Tom Curry (L) accused him of calling him a ‘white ****’ in their World Cup semi-final

Supporters suggested he was saying ‘wit kant’, which translates in Afrikaans as ‘white side’

In the 28th minute, Curry (seen right) approached referee Ben O’Keefe and is heard to say over the referee’s microphone: ‘Sir, sir, if their hooker calls me a white ****, what do I do?’

A report from South African outlet Times Live added that the word **** is not as popularly used in South Africa as it is in the UK – and that many of the country’s nationals find it hard to believe he would have uttered such a racist remark.

One fan said on Twitter: ‘Lost in translation… ‘wit kant’ – white side. Does this mean Bongi spoke Afrikaans to Curry saying, ‘Ky is aan die wit kant / you are on the white side’. 

Another wrote: ‘Wit kant means white side – as in the side that’s wearing the all white kit. Glad the case is closed.’

‘He said ‘WIT KANT,’ read another post. ‘England were wearing white and he said in Afrikaans, Tom Curry must stay on the “white side”.’ 

Curry was questioned about the exchange in the post-match ‘mixed zone’ where interviews are conducted. 

Asked if Mbonambi had said something he shouldn’t have said, Curry said: ‘Yeah.’ He refused to elaborate on what had been said.

When asked if the matter had been cleared up at the end, Curry said: ‘No. It doesn’t need to be talked about.’ 

He was then asked whether any alleged comments were just a reflection of a tough game and said nothing, but was visibly angry and shook his head.

A statement released by World Rugby – the global governing body – confirmed it would look into the alleged incident, saying: ‘World Rugby takes allegations of discriminatory behaviour extremely seriously. 

World Rugby launched an investigation into the incident after the RFU lodged a complaint

‘We can confirm that we are formally reviewing the allegation made by England’s Tom Curry in relation to the use of discriminatory language during the England versus South Africa Rugby World Cup 2023 semi-final on Saturday.

‘World Rugby will not be making any further comment until the conclusion of the process.’

Mail Sport understands that the RFU lodged a complaint with the tournament authorities, in relation to the alleged outburst by Mbonambi. 

After the review was announced, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s official spokesperson told reporters: ‘It is rightly an issue that needs to be looked at very carefully by World Rugby and we await their response.’ 

Source: Read Full Article