![](\"https:\/\/i2-prod.dailystar.co.uk\/incoming\/article31572181.ece\/ALTERNATES\/s615\/0_amazon.jpg\")
<\/p>\nNottingham Forest are the least posh Premier League club because they don\u2019t have enough Waitrose and M&S stores near their ground.<\/p>\n
Wolverhampton Wanderers, Liverpool and Everton also came out at the bottom of the table in the study. The 20 top-flight clubs were judged on how many of the upmarket supermarkets they have in close proximity. <\/p>\n
The number of private schools per 100,000 local people was taken into account, too. Research into how fancy sides are also looked at the average house prices and salaries of supporters.<\/p>\n
READ MORE: Football fans think Lewis Dunk was sent off for calling Anthony Taylor 'f***ing b***end'<\/b><\/p>\n
READ MORE: Eight Premier League clubs named who blocked ban on loaning players from partner teams<\/b><\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Prime Video is available as part of the Amazon Prime membership, which costs \u00a38.99 per month or \u00a395 annually for an individual.<\/p>\n
The membership gives access to all the perks of Amazon Prime (including free Premium and Same- Day Delivery in selected residential postcodes, and other benefits) plus the full library of content available through Prime Video. <\/p>\n
Prime also offers a discounted membership, Prime Student for higher education students.<\/p>\n
You can also sign-up for Prime Video on its own for \u00a35.99 per month, however, you won\u2019t get the other benefits that come with Prime \u2014 like free One-Day Delivery and Same-Day Delivery on eligible orders and fast grocery delivery and pickup.<\/p>\n
\u00a35.99 per month for Prime Video only, or \u00a38.99 per month for Amazon Prime membership<\/p>\n
Forest have just 0.67 Waitrose and Marks and Spencers for every 100,000 people. They have just 1.33 fee-paying schools for them, house prices are worth around \u00a3185,000 and locals earn \u00a323,377.<\/p>\n
It gave them a poshness score of just 1.58 out of 10. Wolves have less posh supermarkets – 0.43 – but more independent schools – 1.71. Their median house prices – \u00a3195,000 – and annual salaries – \u00a326,282 – were both higher. They got two for the overall mark.<\/p>\n
What do you think about the rankings? Let us know in the comments section<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/i2-prod.dailystar.co.uk\/incoming\/article31574625.ece\/ALTERNATES\/s615b\/0_Nottingham-Forest-v-Brighton-Hove-Albion-Premier-League.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Liverpool and Everton scored the same as they are located so closely together in the city. They have 1.38 close-upmarket grocery scores, but only 0.79 private schools.<\/p>\n
Locals early about \u00a328,289 and their homes are worth \u00a3161,000, leading to a total posh score of 2.84 Top of the table was unsurprisingly Chelsea with 2.08 local M&S and Waitrose's and 4.17 fee-paying schools. <\/p>\n
The average salary is \u00a341,892 but house prices are a staggering \u00a31,357,500. They got the Blues an overall total of 9.68 out of 10.<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/i2-prod.dailystar.co.uk\/incoming\/article31574624.ece\/ALTERNATES\/s615b\/0_Westfield-Stratford-City-Shopping-Centre.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Local neighbours Fulham were third with a whopping 3.82 posh shops and 7.09 private schools per 100,000 people. Houses cost \u00a3770,000 and fans earn \u00a340,952 per year, meaning they got 9.53 overall.<\/p>\n
Surprisingly, Tottenham came in third despite historically high poverty rates. There are 1.89 of the supermarkets close by and 2.27 of the schools. Locals earn \u00a333,906 per annum and houses cost \u00a3585,000, resulting in a total score of 7.84. The study was carried out by Ticketgum.<\/p>\n
A spokesperson said: \u201cThe football connoisseurs at Ticketgum set out to unveil the poshest Premier League teams. By scrutinising four potential indicators of poshness, involving median house prices, gross annual pay, total number of Waitrose and Marks & Spencer stores. <\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/i2-prod.dailystar.co.uk\/incoming\/article31574628.ece\/ALTERNATES\/s615b\/1_Interior-of-Waitrose-supermarket-shop-store-Ipswich-Suffolk-England-UK.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\u201cAs well as private schools – all within the same local authority as each club\u2019s football stadium. Nottingham Forest claims the accolade to be the least posh Premier League football club (1.58\/10), with the gross annual income in the Nottingham authority being the lowest at \u00a323,377.<\/p>\n
\u201cChelsea holds the title of the poshest Premier League team boasting an impressive overall score of 9.68\/10. Its home stadium, Stamford Bridge, is situated in one of the UK\u2019s wealthiest areas where the median house price reaches \u00a31,357,500.<\/p>\n
"Meanwhile, Chelsea residents, as the nation\u2019s highest earners command a gross annual pay standing at \u00a341,892 – nearly \u00a37,000 above the national average of \u00a334,963.\u201d<\/p>\n